I don't know the original source but my friend Ramsey sent me this and I thought it was quite interesting:

The five-yearly update of The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (SOED) came out last week. One matter has caused a lot of comment - the decision by its editors to omit the hyphen from some 16,000 words in the work.

Some reports have assumed that this means the end of the hyphen in all word compounds and even its demise as a punctuation mark. It's too early to assert this, though Angus Stevenson, the editor of the SOED, does say that "we've been finding the hyphen is used less and less" and five years ago the Oxford English Dictionary noted that even then the hyphen was being used only half as much as it had been 10 years earlier. It seems that people just can't be bothered with it. He suggests that it is being squeezed as informal ways of communicating - popularised by text messages and emails - become more common in newspapers and books. "People aren't confident about using hyphens any more; they're not really sure what they are for." Because they are unsure how to use the punctuation mark, he says, "It's now popping up in places where it was never used before, as in the ubiquitous 'Time to top-up your mobile'." He feels designers are a significant influence: "Printed writing is very much design-led these days, and people feel that hyphens mess up the look of a nice bit of typography. The hyphen is seen as messy looking and old-fashioned."

A hyphen is a short dash specifically used to connect two words or to join syllables of a word that have been separated by the end of a line in printing. Its name is from the Greek "huphen", together, though the Greek hyphen was a half circle under the words to link them. The use of hyphens to fill out or justify lines of text of fixed length goes back to Gutenberg. The hyphen is not the same as the dash - in typography, a dash is a form of parenthesis; it was once also used to mark the omission of words or letters, perhaps because they were considered rude.

Compound nouns have traditionally begun as separate or hyphenated words but with a strong tendency over time to collapse into single words. A century ago, it was standard practice to write "to-day", but the hyphen has long since evaporated from the page; similarly with "teenager" ("teen-ager" from its first use in 1941 until the later 1950s) and "lipstick" (two words in the 1880s, but becoming hyphenated around the 1920s). Americans have long been much more willing to write words such as "postmodern" without the hyphens that British standards require. It will be no surprise to learn that the SOED writes "email", not "e-mail", and "website" rather than "Web site", since neither is new - they were so listed in the 11th edition of the Concise Oxford in 2004 (I'm old-fashioned in preferring the separated forms). The new SOED lists many hyphenless words such as "leapfrog", "bumblebee", "crybaby", "pigeonhole", "lowlife", and "upmarket", which will be a relief to those of us who have been spelling them like that all along (and all except "lowlife" are written without hyphens in the 2004 Concise Oxford anyway). The SOED does retain hyphens for compound verbs such as "court-martial".

But what is more interesting is the number of words that - on the evidence of the big Oxford English Corpus and the Reading Programme of the Oxford English Dictionary - are bucking the conflationary trend and are returning to separate words without their dashing copulas. So the SOED writes the terms - among many others - as "fig leaf", "fire drill", "ice cream", "pot belly", "test tube", and "water bed". It's notable that this extends to their attributive forms, such as "ice cream headache" from last week's OED update (I ache to change that to "ice-cream headache"). The grammar books argue that a hyphen is required here. In this situation, leaving the hyphen out can sometimes lead to misunderstanding ("twenty odd people" is not the same as "twenty-odd people") which is why its inclusion has been urged. But most of the time the meaning is clear without it, so the trend towards omitting it isn't causing many problems.

There can be no doubt from the accumulated evidence that the hyphen is on its way out, though reports of its demise are premature.